The political atmosphere in Edo State has grown tense following a controversial statement by Governor Monday Okpebholo, warning former presidential candidate Peter Obi not to enter the state without his approval. This declaration sparked a fierce backlash, particularly from Labour Party (LP) senators, who insist that the governor’s words represent an abuse of power. As the debate unfolds, LP senators tackled Okpebholo head-on, defending constitutional rights and questioning the motive behind such a directive.
Defending Democracy, Not Just Obi
When LP senators tackled Okpebholo, they are not only defending Peter Obi; they are standing up for democratic values and constitutional liberties. Their reaction came swiftly after the governor’s comment linking Obi’s recent visit to a resurgence in local violence. The senator’s joint statement called the governor’s words “executive rascality and abuse of office,” demanding a retraction and public apology.
Senator Victor Umeh, speaking on behalf of the LP caucus, referenced Section 41(1) of the 1999 Constitution, which guarantees every Nigerian the right to move freely within the country. “Peter Obi is a Nigerian citizen,” Umeh stated. “His freedom of movement is not subject to any governor’s mood.”
“We humbly urge the Executive Governor of Edo State to quickly withdraw his unguarded statement threatening Mr Peter Obi’s life, freedom of movement, and personal security and tender an unreserved apology to all Nigerians for violating the Nigerian Constitution, which he swore to uphold,” the statement released on Saturday read in part.
“Mr Peter Obi is a citizen of Nigeria, and his movement is guaranteed and should not be curtailed by sheer Executive lawlessness and impudence,” the senators said.
“As a champion of democracy, nation-building and sustainable development, Mr Peter Obi deserves protection and support from the law and all who share the vision for a better Nigeria.”
To many Nigerians, this is not just about Obi. It is about the growing trend of political leaders blurring the lines between security oversight and personal power. Okpebholo’s statement set off alarm bells for those wary of authoritarian undertones.
On social media, reactions were swift and passionate. @KaizenMindset_3 tweeted, “Okpebholo is not above the law. He must be reminded that Nigeria is a democracy, not a motor park where touts issue threats unchecked.” Others, like @famesh2002, found the call for an apology laughable, asking, “Apologise for what? We play too much.”
Reactions Show Nigerians Are Paying Attention
The comments reflect deep political divisions but also a citizenry that is alert and engaged. @archijnrhez lamented, “Since dem put this man in government house, all his speeches is ‘Edo is for Tinubu.’ I have not heard any useful speech from him at all.”
Interestingly, some users tried to rationalize the governor’s perspective. @DOlumolade wrote, “Obi is a presidential aspirant, and that makes him a target. As the state’s Chief Security Officer, the governor is within his rights to be cautious.” However, even those sympathetic to the governor acknowledged that his method of delivery could have been more responsible.
Another user, @seunmarcuz, offered a balanced take: “Bro I don’t support Obi, but let’s say the truth. The governor said rubbish and he was out of line. Politics shouldn’t be do or die.”
These reactions show that Nigerians are watching, analyzing, and speaking out. The outcry reveals a country where political engagement is not just for elites, but a daily conversation among everyday citizens.
Also Read: Obidients Fire Back: ‘Peter Obi Doesn’t Need Permission to Visit Edo’
The Bigger Picture
Beyond the back-and-forth between LP senators and Governor Okpebholo lies a deeper issue about how Nigeria handles opposition voices and citizen rights. While *LP senators tackled Okpebholo for his remarks, they also indirectly spotlight a worrying trend: the weaponization of state power against political opponents.
Some commentators, like @pbasil993, took the logic further. “If Sowore wants to enter Benin, should he also get permission? Are we now saying politicians must get clearance to move around Nigeria?”
It is a fair question. What precedent does this set? If opposition figures require security clearance just to visit states governed by rival parties, Nigeria’s democracy risks becoming a club of the like-minded rather than a contest of ideas.
A Call for Civility and Constitutional Clarity
As this controversy simmers, the LP senators’ message remains clear. Nigeria is a democracy. Political competition is healthy, but it must operate within the rule of law.
Let us not forget what this debate is truly about. Not Peter Obi. Not Okpebholo. But about whether we, as a nation, uphold the rights enshrined in our constitution.
Where Do You Stand?
In the end, the question is not just whether LP senators tackled Okpebholo effectively. The bigger question is whether Nigerians will continue to speak out when those in power cross the line. Should governors have the authority to restrict political rivals from visiting their states? Or should the law apply to everyone equally?
We want to hear from you. What do you think about the governor’s comments? Were they justified, or did they cross a dangerous line? Share your thoughts and let’s keep this conversation going. After all, democracy thrives when citizens care enough to speak up.
