Wednesday, April 30, 2025
Google search engine
HomeReportsKano Government Defends Blasphemy Laws Following ECOWAS Court Ruling

Kano Government Defends Blasphemy Laws Following ECOWAS Court Ruling

In a statement released on Sunday, Ibrahim Waiya, the state Commissioner for Information and Internal Affairs, emphasized that Kano has the legal right to protect the values and beliefs of its predominantly Muslim population.

The Kano State Government is standing firm in support of its blasphemy laws after a recent ruling by the ECOWAS Court of Justice. The court’s decision stated that some aspects of these laws are inconsistent with international human rights standards, prompting a heated discussion on the issue.

In a statement released on Sunday, Ibrahim Waiya, the state Commissioner for Information and Internal Affairs, emphasized that Kano has the legal right to protect the values and beliefs of its predominantly Muslim population. He maintained that the government would not bow to external pressures, insisting that their duty is to uphold the religious and moral values of their community while still respecting international opinions.

Read Also: CNG: President Tinubu’s Bold Vision of cheaper Energy for posterity

Waiya explained, “The Kano government’s defense is rooted in Nigeria’s federal system, where states have the authority to create laws that reflect their local social, moral, and religious contexts.” He noted that the people of Kano have entrusted their leaders with the responsibility of maintaining peace and protecting their religious values, which he believes are central to their mission. He assured that Kano blasphemy laws will remain in place.

While acknowledging the ECOWAS Court’s judgment, Waiya reaffirmed the state government’s commitment to safeguarding religious sanctity and public order. He stated that although they respect the court’s authority, it is essential that their laws reflect the unique moral and religious fabric of the people of Kano.

Kano blasphemy laws recognize Nigeria’s legal pluralism, allowing state legislatures to legislate on issues within the Concurrent Legislative List, including criminal law. The state’s stance demonstrates its intent to balance local religious beliefs with the broader calls for human rights standards, creating an ongoing debate about the role of such laws in the region.

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

knowledge base

Recent Comments